mirror: 初始快照

data/2073.json

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+{
+    "id": 2073,
+    "wordhead": "𠧞",
+    "explanation": "灼龜坼也。从卜；兆，象形。",
+    "volume": "03",
+    "radical": "卜",
+    "pronunciation": "治小切",
+    "variants": [
+        {
+            "wordhead": "兆",
+            "explanation": "古文兆<span>[<span>𡉵</span>]</span>省。",
+            "seal_character": "坆"
+        }
+    ],
+    "seal_character": "坅",
+    "pinyin": "zhao",
+    "pinyin_full": "zhào",
+    "components": [
+        "兆",
+        "卜"
+    ],
+    "xuan_note": "",
+    "kai_note": "",
+    "duan_notes": [
+        {
+            "explanation": "灼龜坼也。",
+            "note": "周禮注曰。兆者灼龜發於火。其形可占者。其象似玉瓦原之璺罅。是用名之焉。按凡曰朕兆者。朕者如舟之縫。兆者如龜之坼。皆引伸假借也。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "从⺊兆。象形。",
+            "note": "治少切。二部。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "古文𠧞省。",
+            "note": "按古文衹爲象形之字。小篆加⺊。非古文減⺊也。廣韵曰。𠧞灼龜坼。出文字指歸。兆治小切。引說文分也。分也之訓見八部？下。𠧞出說文、則不得云出文字指歸。葢古本說文⺊部無𠧞兆字。八部？字卽龜兆字。今？音兵列切。⺊部？中多一筆以殊於？。皆非古也。玉篇⺊部之外。別爲兆部。云兆、事先見也。形也。𠧞同上。假令顧氏所據說文早同今本。何爲作此紛更乎。是必說文無兆而增此一部。曉然。據篇、韵以正說文。可無疑矣。尋此字之原委。葢由虞翻讀尙書分？三苗爲？。云？、古別字。由是信之者讀說文八部之？爲兵列切。又增竄八亦聲於說解中。而說文乃無龜兆字矣。說文無龜兆字。梁顧氏作玉篇乃增兆部於⺊部之後。隨曹憲作文字指歸乃又收𠧞爲龜兆字。而改竄說文者乃於⺊部增𠧞爲篆文、兆爲古文。又恐其形之溷於八部也。乃加增一筆以殊之。紕繆之由。歷歷可見。前注八部。未能了然。後之學者依此說而刪定可也。○又按集韵、類篇皆引說文𠧞古省或作？。臣光曰。按？兵列切。重八也。𠧞古當作？。是則勉強區分。葢由司馬公始。徐鍇、徐鉉、丁度等皆作？。司馬公所襲者、夏竦輩之書也。"
+        }
+    ],
+    "indexes": [
+        "𠧞",
+        "兆"
+    ]
+}