mirror: 初始快照

data/3898.json

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+{
+    "id": 3898,
+    "wordhead": "圛",
+    "explanation": "回行也。从囗睪聲。《尚書》：“曰圛。” 圛，升雲半有半無。讀若驛。",
+    "volume": "06",
+    "radical": "囗",
+    "pronunciation": "羊益切",
+    "variants": [],
+    "seal_character": "待",
+    "pinyin": "yi",
+    "pinyin_full": "yì",
+    "components": [
+        "囗",
+        "睪"
+    ],
+    "xuan_note": "",
+    "kai_note": "",
+    "duan_notes": [
+        {
+            "explanation": "回行也。",
+            "note": "謂回曲而行。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "从囗。𥇡{少一橫}聲。",
+            "note": "羊益切。古音在五部。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "商書曰。",
+            "note": "商各本譌尙。今依廣韵、玉篇正。曰字各本無。今補。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "曰圛。",
+            "note": "句絶。商書謂洪範。曰圛、唐衞包。改爲曰驛。而尙書正義、詩齊風正義皆作曰圛。此天寶以前未改之本也。自貞觀以前。史記宋世家集解云。尙書作圛。引鄭注。圛、色澤而光明也。周禮大卜注引洪範。曰雨、曰濟、曰圛、曰蟊、曰剋。齊風鄭箋云。古文尙書弟爲圛。皆古文尙書作圛之明證也。古文尙書弟爲圛者、謂夏矦歐陽作弟。古文尙書則作圛也。言此者、證詩之弟字亦當爲圛而訓明也。知今文尙書作弟者、宋世家作涕可證也。今本鄭箋作以弟爲圛、衍一字而不可通矣。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "圛者、",
+            "note": "者字依廣韵、五經文字補。舊讀圛圛升雲爲句。誤甚。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "升雲半有半無。",
+            "note": "此釋書曰圛之義。與本訓回行不同。故箸之。如𤊾席別於火不明、堲讒別於以土增大道。文法正同。升雲半有半無。正某氏氣落驛不連屬、王肅霍驛消減如雲陰、所本。如許說則商書圛字正繹之假借。"
+        }
+    ],
+    "indexes": [
+        "圛"
+    ]
+}