Files
shuowen-database/data/718.json
T
2026-10-02 22:48:02 +08:00

47 lines
2.1 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{
"id": 718,
"wordhead": "余",
"explanation": "語之舒也。从八,舍省聲。",
"volume": "02",
"radical": "八",
"pronunciation": "以諸切",
"variants": [
{
"wordhead": "𠎳",
"explanation": "二余也。讀與余同<span> <span>[<span>以</span><span>諸</span><span>切</span>,<span>j</span><span>ĭ</span><span>o</span>]</span> </span>。",
"seal_character": "儝"
}
],
"seal_character": "儜",
"pinyin": "yu",
"pinyin_full": "yú",
"components": [
"余",
"八",
"舍"
],
"xuan_note": "",
"kai_note": "",
"duan_notes": [
{
"explanation": "語之舒也。",
"note": "語、匡謬正俗引作䛐。左氏傳。小白余敢貪天子之命。無下拜。此正䛐之舒。亏部曰。亏、於也。象气之舒亏。然則余亏異字而同音義。釋詁云。余、我也。余、身也。孫炎曰。余舒遟之身也。然則余之引伸訓爲我。詩書用予不用余。左傳用余不用予。曲禮下篇。朝諸矦分職授政任功。曰予一人。注云。覲禮曰伯父寔來。余一人嘉之。余予古今字。凡言古今字者、主謂同音、而古用彼今用此異字。若禮經古文用余一人。禮記用予一人。余予本異字異義。非謂予余本卽一字也。顏師古匡謬正俗不達斯恉。且又以予上聲余平聲爲分別。又不知古音平上不甚區分。重悂貤繆。儀禮漢讀攷糾之詳矣。"
},
{
"explanation": "从八。",
"note": "象气之分散。"
},
{
"explanation": "舍省聲。",
"note": "以諸切。五部。"
},
{
"explanation": "二余也。讀與余同。",
"note": "五部。按易困九四來徐徐。子夏作荼荼。王肅作余余。皆舒意也。許言𠎳之形。未言其義。舉此以補之。"
}
],
"indexes": [
"余",
"𠎳"
]
}