mirror: 初始快照

data/718.json

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+{
+    "id": 718,
+    "wordhead": "余",
+    "explanation": "語之舒也。从八，舍省聲。",
+    "volume": "02",
+    "radical": "八",
+    "pronunciation": "以諸切",
+    "variants": [
+        {
+            "wordhead": "𠎳",
+            "explanation": "二余也。讀與余同<span>   <span>[<span>以</span><span>諸</span><span>切</span>，<span>j</span><span>ĭ</span><span>o</span>]</span> </span>。",
+            "seal_character": "儝"
+        }
+    ],
+    "seal_character": "儜",
+    "pinyin": "yu",
+    "pinyin_full": "yú",
+    "components": [
+        "余",
+        "八",
+        "舍"
+    ],
+    "xuan_note": "",
+    "kai_note": "",
+    "duan_notes": [
+        {
+            "explanation": "語之舒也。",
+            "note": "語、匡謬正俗引作䛐。左氏傳。小白余敢貪天子之命。無下拜。此正䛐之舒。亏部曰。亏、於也。象气之舒亏。然則余亏異字而同音義。釋詁云。余、我也。余、身也。孫炎曰。余舒遟之身也。然則余之引伸訓爲我。詩書用予不用余。左傳用余不用予。曲禮下篇。朝諸矦分職授政任功。曰予一人。注云。覲禮曰伯父寔來。余一人嘉之。余予古今字。凡言古今字者、主謂同音、而古用彼今用此異字。若禮經古文用余一人。禮記用予一人。余予本異字異義。非謂予余本卽一字也。顏師古匡謬正俗不達斯恉。且又以予上聲余平聲爲分別。又不知古音平上不甚區分。重悂貤繆。儀禮漢讀攷糾之詳矣。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "从八。",
+            "note": "象气之分散。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "舍省聲。",
+            "note": "以諸切。五部。"
+        },
+        {
+            "explanation": "二余也。讀與余同。",
+            "note": "五部。按易困九四來徐徐。子夏作荼荼。王肅作余余。皆舒意也。許言𠎳之形。未言其義。舉此以補之。"
+        }
+    ],
+    "indexes": [
+        "余",
+        "𠎳"
+    ]
+}